LEVENDARY CAFE ANALYSIS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

LEVENDARY CAFE ANALYSIS - Essay Example Thus, she still cannot be considered as a seasoned CEO and still needs to prove her capability and efficacy for the responsibility. She still does not have any experience in establishing international or multinational brand either and while she had worked in a global accounting firm, the industry is way different from Lavendery Cafà © and thereby did not provide her the necessary learning curve for her new job. The rest of the management issues that Lavendery CEO MIA Foster is facing sprouted on this relative inexperience of hers. The most obvious difficulty that Foster is facing is how to manage their China point person, Louis Chen. Chen made a remarkable progress in establishing Lavendery presence in China with only a short period of time. Even Foster admitted that Chen is an asset to the company only that he is difficult to manage. Chen seems non-cooperative with Foster in standardizing its operation according to its parent company in the USA as well as to conform to the company’s format in financial reporting. Chen’s adamant to respect Foster’s authority may have been attributed by the fact that he was hired by Lavendery’s founder Howard Leventhal and not Foster herself. They have several clashes with regard to their business strategy as well as their formats in their financial report. Chen seemed to have â€Å"redesigned† the concept of Lavendery Cafe in China that infuriated its Chief Concept Officer Lucian Lelerc to the point of asking Mia Foster to stop Chen now. Unlike in the United States where the concept of Lavendery Cafe is uniform and standardized with slight variations to accommodate a specific peculiarity of a regional market (i.e. offering few soup items and more drink options in the South and allowing one or two regional specialties to be added to its core menu where it is listed in its menu items in order of local popularity) Chen seemed to have taken the variation to the extreme with only Pudong and Beijing embassy row that has semblance to its counterpart in the US. Chen’s seeming non-cooperation to make his financial reporting conform with company format that is consistent with the Generally Accepted Accounting Practic e (GAAP) is also a special concern for Foster because this can have implication not only in the operation of their business but will also have legal consequences. The Chinese operation is reflected in the financial statement of Lavendery Cafe which will also be reported in turn to the Securities and Exchange Commission according to GAAP standards. Any deviation from good accounting practices may be penalized by SEC especially in this time of heightened awareness in accounting (Enron aftermath) and this could affect the image and the brand of the company whose repercussions are long-term. This will also incur unnecessary cost and manpower in reconciling the format of financial reports in hiring an external financial analyst. In short, Mia Foster’s relationship with Louis Chen is problematic to say the least as Chen seemed antagonistic in listening to the directives of the CEO. Their conflict however in this kind of venture that involves multinational entity is not uncommon Chi na due to their clashing culture and values (Tjosvold et al 168). With regard to whose perspective will works in China, it would also debatable to use Foster and Lelerc perspective as a yardstick in determining what is the best approach in gaining foothold in a foreign market considering that both do not have experience in establishing a brand in foreign market. Moreso when Lavendery Cafe’s foreign market presence is only limited to Dubai and China. 2.

The role of the rule of law in the criminal justice process in UK Essay

The role of the rule of law in the criminal justice process in UK - Essay Example In the British Criminal Justice System, divisions like the Crown Prosecution Sector, the police, the law courts and the prisons operate together to bring about criminal justice. In general, the three departments are mutually responsible for the Criminal Justice System (CJS) and its subdivisions. These three consist of (i) The Ministry of Justice, which is concerned with the magistrates' law courts, the Appeals Courts, the Crown Court, the National Offender Management Service, and the Legal Services Commission (ii) The Home Office under whose jurisdiction are the police (iii) The Attorney General's Office which is in charge of the Serious Fraud Department, the Crown Prosecution Service, and the Customs and Revenue Prosecutions Division In ordinary circumstances, it is the responsibility of the Ministry of Justice to oversee the entire justice procedure (Roberson, Wallace and Stuckey, 2009). It is responsible for justice being meted out from the time when a suspect is apprehended, to t he time they are charged with a crime and incarcerated (if this is the result) (Schmalleger, 2009). The Ministry of Justice also plays a role in a felon’s probation process. The ministry is also expected to provide legal aid, and seek to decrease the chances of re-offending. The Home Office, on the other hand, is responsible for safeguarding the public from instances of crime, terror and other anti-social behaviours. The home office ensures people’s safety in order to facilitate investment and peaceful coexistence. It also promotes the acceptable level of tolerance that allows people to live with others from different backgrounds without there being unnecessary problems that come about through misunderstandings. This division is responsible for counter terrorism initiatives, safe policing and overall crime reduction strategies.  The Attorney General, who is usually assisted in handling these responsibilities by the Solicitor General, is the key legal counsel to the B ritish Government (McLeod, 2010). Both the Solicitor General and the Attorney General are responsible for making sure that all citizens uphold the rule of law.   The Attorney General also has additional public interest responsibilities such as committing to objecting to extremely lenient sentences that are given to serious criminals, as well as initiating proceedings in courts concerning the Contempt of Court Act (Zander, 2007). The function of the Criminal Justice System (CJS) is to bring all to justice by convicting and imprisoning the felons while defending the public. It is also in charge of investigating crimes and making sure that the perpetrators are held accountable for their crimes (Packer, 1968). The CJS also carries out other functions such as executing court orders, collecting fines and overseeing custodial as well as community punishment.   The main objectives for the CJS are:   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To enhance their efficiency in bringing crimes and their p erpetrators to justice.   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To boost public confidence in the way the CJS conducts its operations   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To make crime victims feel that their grievances have been satisfactorily addressed by the Police unit as well as the CJS.   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To constantly gather, evaluate, and make use of statistics concerning different ethnicities so as to identify irregularities in the distribution of responsibilities in the CJS.   Ã¢â‚¬ ¢Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   To increase the finding of criminal factors so that the public is made aware that criminals will not go unpunished (Sanders and Young, 2000). While not all the members of society are predisposed to crime, such a step will help in discouraging potential criminals. The Basic Concept Underlying the Rule of Law In the 19th and 18th British society, many individuals who belonged to the upper classes were not treated in the same way as the rest of the British citizens. If they committed any crimes, they had special government laws that would be used to judge their cases